Talk:Vilno-Dvinsk offensive

Possible sources

UK & US newspaper sources

• "Germans gain ground". Delaware County Times. 1915-09-17. Retrieved 2022-12-31 – via Newspapers.com.
• "Germans sever Russian railway". The Marthasville Record. 1915-09-17. Retrieved 2022-12-31 – via Newspapers.com.
• "Russian successes". Liverpool Daily Post and Liverpool Mercury. 1915-09-25. Retrieved 2022-12-31 – via Newspapers.com.
• "Germans weakening on the Eastern Front". Liverpool Echo. 1915-10-09. Retrieved 2022-12-31 – via Newspapers.com.
• "The Russians' attack". Liverpool Echo. 1915-10-09. Retrieved 2022-12-31 – via Newspapers.com.
• "Successes East and West". The Birmingham Daily Mail. 1915-09-28. Retrieved 2022-12-31 – via Newspapers.com.
• "Russian Army caught in trap?". Times Union. 1915-09-21. Retrieved 2022-12-31 – via Newspapers.com.
• "Dvinsk. Critical engagement still undecided". The Birmingham Daily Mail. 1915-09-24. Retrieved 2022-12-31 – via Newspapers.com.

Peaceray (talk) 02:29, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Cavalry on the Flank and in the Rear

• Golovine, N. N. (January 1922). "Cavalry on the Flank and in the Rear". The Cavalry Journal. 31 (126). Translated by Nikolaieff, A. M. Washington, DC: The United States Cavalry Association. OCLC 659483264.

Peaceray (talk) 22:06, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

I have uploaded a map to Commons from the above article. Please see File:Russian thwarting of German offensive near Vilno, September 1915, WWI.png. Peaceray (talk) 17:50, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Books & journal articles

• "Chronlogy of the War, Showing Progress of Campaigns on All Fronts and Collarteral Event from September 12, 1915, Up to and Including October 12, 1915". Current history. 3. New York: New York Times: 407. 1916. OCLC 1194377697.
• Reynolds, Francis Joseph; et al., eds. (1916). "The Conquest of Grodno and Vilna". The Story of the Great War. Vol. VII. New York: P. F. Collier & Son. pp. 2065–2073. OCLC 1152915057.

---

Peaceray (talk) 06:12, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Completed

I have completed the article. I have nothing more to add.Vaclaw1990 (talk) 06:01, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

It is not yet compliant with MOS:SURNAME, which means the first initials generally need to be removed after first mention. I can take care of this, but not tonight. I am editing in PST (UTC−08:00), so approaching my bedtime. Peaceray (talk) 06:37, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! Vaclaw1990 (talk) 06:40, 19 January 2023 (UTC)