Talk:Vince Macaulay

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Dekimasu in topic Requested move

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move the page to Vince Macaulay, per the discussion below. Actually, the article was originally at this title, and was moved by cut-and-paste. I have merged the edit histories. Dekimasuよ! 01:08, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


Vince Macaulay-RazaqVince Macaulay — More common name, Google says "Vince Macaulay" -razaq=661, "Vince Macaulay-Razaq"=99, and in <first name> <last name> format. —SeveroTC 23:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Survey

edit
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Discussion

edit
Any additional comments:

In all such cases, continue to apply the general rule that Wikipedia uses the form of the name that is most common for referring to the person in question

In my reading, what the subject wants to be called is less important than what he is commonly called. SeveroTC 00:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • Additionally, I made a typo in the reasoning, which made my argument of commonest name not make sense. I've corrected it to be "Google says "Vince Macaulay" -razaq=661, "Vince Macaulay-Razaq"=99". Sorry for any confusion on that. SeveroTC 00:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.