Talk:Violent Cop

(Redirected from Talk:Violent Cop (1989 film))
Latest comment: 3 months ago by SafariScribe in topic Requested move 27 July 2024

Untitled

edit

If you're looking for edits to this text from before 2004-06-24, please see the article under Kitano Takeshi. The majority of the articles on Kitano's films (save Dolls and Zatouichi were adapted from the version found there before my (AsianAstronaut) edits on 2006-06-23 and 2006-06-24. They were split off because they were too lengthy for his article and were more concerned with the movies themselves and not how they related to Kitano's career. There's still some overlap between the movie articles and the original Kitano article, so if you see fit to change the wordings around on these, rewrite them entirely, etc., please do. --AsianAstronaut 06:50, 2004 Jun 24 (UTC)

I think it is interesting that in the film summary that you summize Azumas violence as

"After the death of his friend and colleague Iwaki, and the kidnapping of his sister by yakuza gangsters, Azuma breaks all the rules of ethical conduct. He responds to every situation with violence, and resorts to unethical methods if they produce results."

However I think that from the first time Azuma appears on screen, in which he beats one of the homeless attacking boys it is clear that he is not a cop who follows ethical conventions, personally I think that the situation with the Iwakis death and the subsequent kidnapping of his sister that Azuma follows a path of self destruction from which his own death is the only likely outcome. Quite similar to the paths of death in other Kitano movies, or am I just thinking too much!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.214.222.175 (talk) 08:56, 28 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Title

edit

I believe this page should be re-redirected to the "Sono Otoko, Kyōbō ni Tsuki" page for two reasons - 1. it avoids confusion with the other film - and 2. it is the true name of the film (see: Léon).

Also I corrected the "literal" translation to the actual literal translation. -- Kyobonitsuki 18:30, 16 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

It is a naming convention to use the English language version of a name of a work of fiction, unless the name in the original language is more common in English usage, e.g. Hana-bi or Les Liaisons dangereuses. - Ajshm 19:06, 16 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Kitano1st.jpg

edit
 

Image:Kitano1st.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 19:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Financial success?

edit

The Japanese wkipedia just says "mazumazu no seiseki" which would mean it was a limited success, and it mentions a figure of 500 million yen made for a budget of 460 million yen. So it isn't really a financial success by film standards. Maybe someone can clarify this? The J.Wiki gives no source for the figures. JoshuSasori (talk) 10:49, 16 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 27 July 2024

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. The Dab page per consensus isn't necessary since a hatnote can solve disambiguation issue. (closed by non-admin page mover) Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 21:50, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


Violent Cop is currently a disambiguation page with only 2 links after Violent Cop (2000 Kant Leung film) was deleted. The 1989 movie seems significantly more notable: daily average traffic over 30x more than the 2000 film :[[1]], Rotten Tomatoes lists 6 reviews with additional ones found like BFI, Telegraph, The Vindicator. I didn't find any reviews for the 2000 film. The disambiguation page should actually be deleted after this move but I don't know if it's possible through this process or should a separate AfD started for that. Mika1h (talk) 21:15, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.