A fact from Visa FIVB Beach Volleyball International appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 September 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volleyball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Volleyball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolleyballWikipedia:WikiProject VolleyballTemplate:WikiProject VolleyballVolleyball articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hey, I'm in the process of copy-editing this, however I'm not quite able to finish. I've pretty much covered grammar and spelling up to and including the section called "Last 16", however, there are still a number of things to be done:
The rest of the article.
Create some consistency in the naming of the teams - I'm going to look at a number of other volleyball-related articles and see if there's any existing convention.
Results tables - I don't know that they warrant a heading on their own, but if they do
Then I think we need to ensure that formatting within the tables is consistent - all winning teams are meant to be in boldface, but I don't think they are.
I've copy edited the complete article. I have no strong view about (2) and (3). On (4), you're right that there were some mistakes, which I've fixed. --Stfg (talk) 13:42, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Reply