Talk:Visa policy of Azerbaijan
Visa policy of Azerbaijan has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 15, 2023. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Visa policy of Azerbaijan appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 June 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Republic of Artsakh / Nagorno-Karabakh
editHello, I've noticed an edit removing the mention of Nagorno-Karabakh from the entry restrictions. No matter what your political view, the government of Azerbaijan does not restrict access to any place called the Republic of Artsakh, only what they call Nagorno-Karabakh. I'm going to re-add a mention of Nagorno-Karabakh, as to ensure a neutral point of view. If anyone has an issue with this, please discuss! Kind regards, ~ Asheiou (talk) 21:09, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Visa policy of Azerbaijan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sunriseshore (talk · contribs) 01:11, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a. (reference section):
- As far as I can see most of the information is cited though sometimes travel websites and magazines were used as source material (as opposed to government websites) However the information is verifibly correct
- b. (citations to reliable sources):
- c. (OR):
- This article describes the Visa policies of the country, I don't see any intentional ideological bias here
- d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a. (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a. (major aspects):
- b. (focused):
- a. (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- This is one of the article's sstrong point
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
- Here is an article that is netural, comprehensive and is well illustrated. Anyone who is not familar with the topic will have a well flushed breakdown on Azerbarjini visa policies after reading the article.
- Pass/fail:
(Criteria marked are unassessed)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 22:32, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- ... that in 2017, British travel magazine Wanderlust rated Azerbaijan's electronic visa as the easiest visa to obtain in the world? Source: https://www.wanderlust.co.uk/content/easiest-visas-worldwide/
Improved to Good Article status by Asheiou (talk). Nominated by BorgQueen (talk) at 17:43, 15 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Visa policy of Azerbaijan; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Technically some MOS:RELTIME that should have been picked up as part of the GA review ("All air travellers can apply for a visa on arrival between 1 April and 15 May 2023" for example) but nothing that breaks DYK rules. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:51, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hiya AirshipJungleman29, I fixed the tensing on that "can apply for a visa on arrival". It was correct at time of the GA review and I forgot to change it now the time has passed. You mentioned "for example". Are there any other issues you can spot? Feel free to WP:FIXIT or let me know so I can fix it! Thanks for bringing this to my attention. -Asheiou (they/them • talk) 21:42, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Non-Ordinary Passports
editThe visa policy map for Non-Ordinary Passports is outdated. May someone please update the map please? Much appreciated for the efforts involved. Yours Sincerely, JapanNagoyaTokyoDec2018 (talk) 07:54, 7 July 2024 (UTC)