Talk:Vision restoration therapy

Response to speedy deletion request

Hello,

I have placed a hold on the speedy deletion of the wiki page "Vision Restoration Therapy." The reason I believe this page should stay is because I am not trying to promote NovaVision or its product. I am just describing this new type of therapy. If there is any way that I can make this page sound less promotional, please let me know. I wanted to give credit to NovaVision and Dr. Sabel because it is their work that I am presenting in this article. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shawn Patel (talk • contribs) 23:55, 29 November 2010‎

Needs complete rewrite

As written, the article is little more than a pr whitepaper. I've tagged the article and have requested help at FTN because as written much of it sounds like pseudoscience. Of course, that may just be the result of the presentation and selection of sources. --Ronz (talk) 23:46, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

As mentioned on fringe, most of the sources are primary, I'm cutting content which are either undue or misleading which is based on primary sources. If someone wishes to re-insert text it should be that which is given due weight by mention in reliable secondary sources. IRWolfie- (talk) 18:38, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for that. Much improved. --Ronz (talk) 20:39, 5 January 2012 (UTC)