Talk:Visual J Sharp

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LondonGermany.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

accuracty of diagram

i was under the impression that J# in many cases just mapped java classes to the corresponding .net ones and didn't bother with seperate ones. Plugwash 01:09, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

J box

What does the box I keep seeing after the letter J mean?? Please fix it. Georgia guy 01:44, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Someones put the proper sharp sign in the title and body text despite the fact that even MS never uses that sign for j#. However this does get arround the problem that # can't be used in article titles ;) If you can't see it then it either means you don't have a sutiable font or are using a browser that sucks at selecting suitable fonts. I cba to undo it but would have no objection to you doing so if you wish. Plugwash 02:20, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Incorrect statement in article

The article states:

"Instead of receiving a File object as a parameter in the Java API, Microsoft's .NET implementation receives a String object containing the file path."

This is simply wrong. Anyone can browse to http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/io/FileOutputStream.html and see that the Java API includes the ability to pass a String argument to the FileOutputStream constructor. This has been true since at least Java 1.1.4 (circa 1997), which is as far back as I have ready references available (The Java Class Libraries, Second Edition, Volume 1 by Chan, Lee, and Kramer; Addison-Wesley).

Subject to personal opinion?

"J# is generally considered to be a proof of concept of .Net language interoperability, and as a marketing tool to lure Java developers to the .Net platform. It is generally not considered to be a language on par with C# or VB.Net, and does not have the same level of support, samples, or updates as the other languages do. This fact notwithstanding, J# is a usable .Net language and has access to all the CLR features."

This seems too be someones personal opinion rather then the truth.

perhaps we should add citations, but I think this is a remark that was made by several people (see here for exemple) (to be clear, I'm not the one who wrote this paragraph) Hervegirod 11:48, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

An aging reference

"The Microsoft J# product team recently made two important" Recently? Not any more, now I have no idea when this happened. It would have been better to say when. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.0.156.10 (talk) 14:49, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Article name

See Talk:Microsoft Visual Studio. --Stefán Örvarr Sigmundsson 03:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on J Sharp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131128170355/http://computer.financialexpress.com/20020729/indnews3.shtml to http://www.expresscomputeronline.com/20020729/indnews3.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 28 November 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) —Nnadigoodluck███ 09:25, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

---

J Sharp → Visual J Sharp – The article focuses entirely on the Visual J# framework, and even the first line says "Visual J# is an implementation of J#", which is problematic in several ways, not the least of which being that this article should help define J#, rather than immediately use J# to define something else. 74.96.161.17 (talk) 16:29, 28 November 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. BegbertBiggs (talk) 22:25, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.