Talk:Visual modularity
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 29 January 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Cleanup request
editThis article desperately needs some cleaning up. It reads like a student's term paper. I hope that someone with expertise in sensation and perception can take care of this.--Cassmus 07:41, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
I seriously disagree with the above: this is a fantastically precise article. If you want a debate spanning tens of thousands of words, all it would be necessary to do is put in brief summaries of the papers quoted in evidence. This is a really complex area of psychology and it pays to cut through all the debate and present a good outline of the area so that those interested have a basis for further research and those just breezing over it in reference from another section can get a rough outline.
If someone does want to expand this, I suggest they should do it tacked on to the bottom of the article and leave the summary as it is.
163.1.143.115 12:36, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Agree with this last comment. Very precise overview of complex area. Might also worth adding something about the two major pathways in the primate visual system (dorsal - ventral), as these seem to be doubly dissociable and committed to specific processing. 137.222.120.9 15:56, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
I will agree that this is clear, and precise overview of a complex area, however citation is done incorrectly for Wikipedia's standards, as well as as 'wikification' was limited, I helped to add a few more blue links to the page. Citation will take a fair bit of work, but is very possible! Neuro√Logic 05:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- I've taken on setting up all the citing properly (It's a long list, it might take me a couple of days to finish) it was written in line like an APA paper, no-no in Wikipedia. I'm listing the page as underconstruction, please don't move any of the references, I have purposefully left the in-text reference list to ensure I get everything. Thanks! Neuro√Logic 07:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
The name 'D. von Cameron' in the references is incorrect. The author should appear as 'D. Y. von Cramon'. Can anyone change this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.107.216.49 (talk) 07:53, 2 December 2011 (UTC)