Talk:Visual neuroscience

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Jesanchrs in topic Potential References

History=

edit

Untitled

edit

Should this have a history section?

Comments

edit

In order to familiarize the scientists at Smith-Kettlewell with wikipedia practices/advantages I create "placeholder" entries that provide the essence of what the named topic will contain.

For some reason the entry on infant vision had its body "reverted" with a redirect to infant (which does not have any significant information about vision in infants) without explanation. I re-entered it after yanksox had redirected it twice - I believe either in error or at least without explanation.

Love.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Love26 (talkcontribs) 15:57, 20 May 2006 (UTC).Reply

this article needed a lot more to it. --Krystathedancer (talk) 19:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think that revising the paragraph was a good idea along with adding the citiation...it would have been nice to have seen another citation or additional information added to the article Rameyer13 (talk) 00:13, 10 October 2011 (UTC)Reply


Potential References

edit

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

  1. ^ "The Visual Neuroscience Training Program". Johns Hopkins Medicine. Retrieved 23 June 2011.
  2. ^ "Freeman Visual Neuroscience Lab". University of California, Berkley. Retrieved 23 June 2011.
  3. ^ "Publications". University of California, Berkley. Retrieved 23 June 2011.
  4. ^ "Laboratory of Visual Neuroscience". Barrow Neurological Institute. Retrieved 23 June 2011.
  5. ^ "Cox Lab". The Rowland Institute at Harvard. Retrieved 23 June 2011.
  6. ^ Pettigrew, edited by J.D. (1986). Visual neuroscience (Repr. ed.). Cambridge [Cambridgeshire] ; New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521258294. {{cite book}}: |first= has generic name (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  7. ^ The Visual Neurosciences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 2004. ISBN 0262033089. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

JSchaef (talk) 04:38, 23 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

This is a good beginning to an article. It states what the topic exactly is, but I'm still not sure what exactly it means. This could be a good article if how visual neuroscience worked in the mind through the eyes was explained and possibly how it was discovered. A few examples may help for better understanding. After reading this article, I am still uncertain about the topic. Jesanchrs (talk) 17:02, 10 October 2011 (UTC)Reply