Talk:Visual odometry
A fact from Visual odometry appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 July 2008, and was viewed approximately 2,418 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Visual odometry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080808123021/http://www.cs.duke.edu/%7Etomasi/papers/tian/tianCvpr96.pdf to http://www.cs.duke.edu/~tomasi/papers/tian/tianCvpr96.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:18, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Irrelevant content
editPlease remove the images to DJI quadcopters - Wikipedia is not a space for advertising or promoting products. The quad-copters are not even referenced in the article and even if they were and you thought the images were appropriate you could have omitted their make and model from the description as this is completely irrelevant, right? Here let me do it for you...
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.59.163.17 (talk) 08:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Egomotion section questions
editHi,
(I am new here and trying to be "bold" in the wikipedia sense, so please be benign!)
As I understand it, the "Egomotion" section addresses two different topics:
1. Egomotion of the camera, being synonymous to visual odometry (or did I miss a point?) and summarizing the descritpion in section "Algorithm".
2. "An example of egomotion estimation would be estimating a car's moving position relative to lines on the road or street signs being observed from the car itself." This is different from VO in that it implies object recognition (road marking lines, traffic signs) and pose estimation relative to those objects, not just velocity and rate estimation without a deeper understanding of any image content.
I would suggest merging the egomotion part into the VO description and possibly mentioning VO as supportive to "Visual servoing" or "Vision Guided Robotic Systems" where VO can help in bridging gaps in (possibly low-frequency) object detection results to have continuous pose feedback (by integrating the velocities and rates onto the sporadic pose estimates of detectors).
Somebody cares to comment?
Regards,
Use in optical computer mice
editIsn't this method also used in an Optical mouse to detect movement? I think this is an important and "relatable" use of this technology, and should be mentioned in this article. 2001:16B8:6497:F1FC:4432:1B61:FE25:9639 (talk) 14:13, 9 May 2021 (UTC)