Talk:Vitarroz

Untitled

Question Why exactly has this been proposed for deletion? It looks like it could be greatly expanded and it needs sources but if it's really the second-largest Hispanic food supplier in the Northeastern U.S. I would say it should be worth at least a stub, no? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prezuiwf (talk • contribs)

Comments regarding speedy deletion proposal

• Oppose deletion - When I created the article, I made sure that it asserted its notability. The article stated that the company is the second largest Hispanic food distributor in Northeastern US, I believe that's clearly an assertion of notability. Dionyseus 08:21, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose deletion. It looks notable, as a large distributor of Hispanic foods. Let's inquire seriously into this first, before making a snap judgement. We need to be deliberate and reasonable with all actions we take here at Wikipedia. Badagnani 08:22, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose deletion. If Goya Foods gets an article, so should this. grendel|khan 08:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry but Goya is an international brand. Vitarroz is a regional distributor. There's a big difference there. Please keep in mind that this is not an AfD discussion. Oppose deletion doesn't mean anything on a talk page. --Адам12901 ^Talk 08:47, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

It is inappropiate to speedy tag an article that asserts notability. If an article does not meet the criteria for speedy deletions, you should put it in AfD instead. Dionyseus 08:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

I do not feel that this article asserted notability. That's why I tagged it for speedy deletion. --Адам12901 ^Talk 09:32, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

The statement "second largest supplier and distributor in northeastern United States" is an assertion of notability which instantly excludes the article from being speedy deleteable as an A7. Dionyseus 09:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC)