This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Gassman brancaleone.gif
editImage:Gassman brancaleone.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Neutrality
editI've seen articles that were more non-neutral and had more of a fan-like tone, but this article needs fixing in that area. Words like "magnetic" and "intellectual honesty" need to be cited if they're quotes and toned down if they're personal opinions. Many of the more admiring passages about "frank"ness and so forth are not written in such a way as to meet Wikipedia's neutral point of view standards. If one is going to say he made enemies in show business (and it should read "show business," not "show biz," in a formal article), there should be secondary or tertiary sources to support the statement — specific examples where a published source names an enemy he made and names the opinion that turned that specific person against him; ideally, the source would even give evidence that person did turn against him, but you can't always "find it all" in a single source. Lawikitejana (talk) 04:04, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- quote: this is one of the most important, and neutral, italian tv program. Today 24 june 2009 the show is about Vittorio Gassman: the words of this article are correct. "magnetic" and "intellectual honesty" aren't personal opinions, but are opinions (from the interviews) of the directors Mario Monicelli, Ettore Scola, Dino Risi and the actor Paolo Villaggio, friend of Gassman --79.54.7.20 (talk) 22:54, 24 June 2009 (UTC)