Talk:Viva Records (Philippines)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was tagged for speedy deletion under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion but a reviewing administrator or uninvolved experienced editor (DESiegel (talk)) declined the request on the basis that: Publishing multiple notable (blue-linked) artists and albums is a claim of significance. This article should not be tagged again for speedy deletion under the same criterion and, unless a valid, separate speedy deletion basis exists, further attempts at deleting this article should be made via the proposed deletion process (prod) if uncontroversial, or the article taken to articles for deletion (AfD) for debate on the merits. Note: this template should be removed once the associated article has survived an AfD debate; or has been significantly changed such that further speedy deletion requests are unlikely. |
Fair use rationale for Image:VIVA Records logo.gif
editImage:VIVA Records logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Expanding the article
editIn my opinion this article should tell more about the actual record label instead of telling about the various releases by the artists. Monni (talk) 19:21, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
PPOP Label
editI think VIVA record's PPOP label should also be mentioned in the article.Max Light 10:46, 20 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mushymushroom (talk • contribs)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:38, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Viva Records (Philippines) → Viva Records
- I just want to prioritize this one rather than the defunct US record label Viva Records (U.S.). j3j3j3...pfH0wHz 06:44, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- It will likely be a while before Viva Records (U.S.) disappears from public knowledge. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.