Talk:Vivah/GA2

Latest comment: 9 years ago by 25 Cents FC in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 05:24, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Reply


I will review this article. Thanks. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 05:24, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

References

edit
  • Some refs say the dates like "10 November 2006" for example and some are written as "Nov 1, 2006". Change those having "Nov 1, 2006" format to "10 November 2006" format.
  Done--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  06:10, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Add the publication dates for all refs having publication dates.
Did not get you. Can you elaborate?--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  06:24, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Reference nos 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 16, 19, 32 — No dates there. (You haven't mentioned when the articles were published). Ex Masand's article was published on 16 February 2008, which you have mentioned. Mention the publication dates for the references I have posted. I have demonstrated for reference number 8. Do the same for the others I have mentioned here in the GAR. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 06:42, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
  Done--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  19:19, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Wind Servers references are dead links. Archive them.
Wind Servers references ??--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  19:21, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Reference numbers 10 and 23. Archive them. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 12:53, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
Have no idea how to do that. Please help.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  07:15, 2 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
  Done for ref 10. Look at my edit summary (WP:PEACOCK) for ref 23. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 08:45, 2 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Standardise all references having Rediff as Rediff.com. (Rediff.com is a website, hence it should not be italicised. Make sure while you are changing all Rediff references to Rediff.com, don't italicise them. The reference nos are 3, 7, 12 and 18.)
  • Remove the italics from reference numbers 1, 2, 6, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 35 in addition to the Rediff references.
  Done Thanks.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  10:36, 2 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

General

edit
  • "Kapoor's performance earned him nomination for Best Actor while Rao received Best Actress nomination at the Screen Awards." — Where's the source for this? Add one please.
  Done--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  12:18, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
    Pass or Fail:  

@25 Cents FC: Congratulations! — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 12:12, 2 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks mate.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  18:32, 2 April 2015 (UTC)Reply