Talk:Vivek Ramaswamy 2024 presidential campaign
Latest comment: 6 months ago by MaximusEditor in topic Should the article be changed to past tense?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vivek Ramaswamy 2024 presidential campaign article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months  |
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Should the article be changed to past tense?
editFor example, instead of "he opposes abortion" it would say "he opposed abortion." NesserWiki (talk) 04:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- I suppose it matters on the use case. If we are talking about positions held in relativity to his campaign, I suppose past tense would be used. But if it is just a position held indefinitely, he probably still holds those positions in present tense. MaximusEditor (talk) 21:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC)