Talk:Vladislav Listyev

Old talk

Vlad Listyev undoubtedly was not only the best journalist in corrupted Russia but also a wonderful person. His personal life was tragic and many people did not know anything about him behind the scene. The mass media began speculating on his death with the only aim of making profit by selling their articles. Loads of unjust things were said about him, many people who even did not know him personally began to tell lies about his background and life, and at the same time those who were pretending to be his friends discovered their real personality shortly after his murder. Such as Andrei Razbash, for example, not only "inherited" a great part of the capital in VID but also his third wife Albina Nazimova. There were rumours about a possible family connection with his murder, as his last wife inherited almost everything after his death, and his son Alexander was threatened and his family had to sell their part of shares at a very low price. Nevertheless, the main version of his murder is commercial, and almost everybody in Russia suspects that it was Berezovskyi (who now asked for "political asilum" in UK) who paid the killers to murder Vlad Listyev (as his motives are transparent to everyone, even to common citizens). But until there is no political will to find and punish those who assesinated him nothing can be done. Not only the police and those at power knows the names of the killers but also many citizens, but the corruption and "political pacts" with the former president of Russia makes the investigation impossible. Even after 10 years Vlad is remembered and loved by milliions of people in every corner of Russia. Thus, he lives in us, through his memory and love.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.58.4.46 (talk • contribs)

Fair use rationale for Image:Vlad Listyev Chas Pik.jpg

Image:Vlad Listyev Chas Pik.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)