![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The most famous?
editI don't agree. I think it could be Un bel di vedremo --195.76.142.130 10:13, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC) es:User:Jdiazch
Re: candidate to be moved to wikisource
editI don't think we should move this article. It covers more than just the text, and, as the article states, it is a very famous aria. Other arias have their own articles; for instance, Nessun Dorma. Moreover, the recording by Maria Callas is a significant work in the world of opera. The libretti should be covered in wikisource; the famous arias should be allowed to remain here on wikipedia. Wikisource is for texts, not for articles about texts. RedRabbit1983 14:14, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
???
editThis is not an aria! is a section of a duet.... an article about a section of a duet?! --Al Pereira(talk) 02:15, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- This is a rather ridiculous article. It is not an aria, and the mention of Callas is questionable. Also, I would hardly describe Butterfly as verismo. This should be severly shorn and merged with the main article, which I will do shortly. --203.129.50.179 09:14, 30 June 2007 (UTC) After I remember to log in. --Alexs letterbox 09:18, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- Absolutely agree. --Al Pereira(talk) 09:11, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
??? second part
editI don't see any reason to have an article about a section of a duet. In addition to this, the article doesn't say anything. --Al Pereira(talk) 05:33, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- And it is not the most famous part of the duet. --Al Pereira(talk) 05:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- I agree, there is nothing special or famous about this part at all. It should be merged with the main article - Jay (talk) 17:02, 15 February 2008 (UTC)