Talk:Volcán de Colima

For an FA...

In order to move up to FA status, this article needs some touching up.

First, References! It surprised me that this article was a GA w/ only one reference! I mean come on.

Next, expansion. This article needs some facts.

Finally, Images. It would be nice to have some more images around.

Meldshal42_{Hit me}^{What I've Done} 19:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Accurate Death Tolls From Eruptions

Should be included, as well as damages from qualified sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.244.170.5 (talk) 03:26, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Ambiguos article

There are 2 mountains 4 kilometers apart: 1) Nevado de Colima 2) Volcan de fuego

The article focus on Volcan de Fuego which is 3,820 mts, but the higher one is Nevado de Colima wich heights at 4,260 mts. Position is for Volcan de Fuego, and very comic the first ascent of 1995 since it has been climbed for a hunderd years by now. My proposal is the article should be rewrite in order to separete both mountains, since the smaller Volcan de Fuego, has a promminence of 600 meters. Here are the INEGI numbers (Mexico's official geographic institute) Anyone has ideas? Pepeleyva (talk) 18:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

It's been on my todo list. In this particular case it may be best to have two seperate articles. Volcan de Fuego is probably the overall more notable because of its active volcanism; but topographically, Nevado de Colima is more notable. So we would have two articles named Volcan de Fuego and Nevado de Colima. I am not 100% sure if this is the best idea though. There are redirects to deal with and we would have to move this page. I guess the obstacles would be what one typically deals with in a split, which I have never done. I figured I would post here before doing anything and try get some others' opinions/help. --RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 04:02, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Forgot to mention another idea for an interim solution would be to leave just this single article, and add to it a second infobox for Nevado de Colima. Then we would at least have the basic data for both peaks properly diplayed. --RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 04:13, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Correction is required

To include the 2013 eruptions. This series of eruptions started in 2013, not 2014. Please excuse me for not volonteering for the job, little may it be. LouisBB (talk) 10:42, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

References

ongoing eruption

still seems to be ash advisories all the way through 2016 but last mention in this article is 2015 - is it all the same ongoing eruption ? EdwardLane (talk) 14:13, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Volcán de Colima. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040212212744/http://www.ucol.mx/volcan/ to http://www.ucol.mx/volcan/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060224212547/http://docente.ucol.mx/~varley/ to http://docente.ucol.mx/~varley

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:23, 4 September 2017 (UTC)