Talk:Voliminal: Inside the Nine

Voliminal: Inside the Nine has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 7, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
September 16, 2008	Good topic candidate	Not promoted
November 21, 2008	Good topic candidate	Not promoted
July 28, 2009	Good topic candidate	Promoted
Current status: Good article

Slipknot (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slipknot, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.SlipknotWikipedia:WikiProject SlipknotTemplate:WikiProject SlipknotSlipknot articles

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

This article was a past Slipknot Article of Focus! You can view the current article of focus, or view other past articles of focus.

Fan Reception

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I added a section regarding the mixed response from the fanbase. A quick look at the reviews for it on Amazon will show a very mixed reception. Surely this section should remain in the article.

I agree, fans are greatly split over this issue, and it needs to be reflected by the article. Nam3witha3init 01:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

We can only use what we have from reliable third-party sources, however. Amazon wouldn't qualify. Black ngold29 23:46, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Voliminal: Inside the Nine/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

"songs on the band's third studio album" - I'd prefer to use the actual album title here, so readers don't have to click the link.
Um... ref 1 publisher doesn't seem to be Musicbox?
Ref 2: Billboard needs italics and you don't need the News and Reviews thing.
What makes http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/12/10/133514.php, http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/dvd-reviews/dvd-review-slipknots-voliminal-inside-the-nine.php, or http://www.tunelabmusic.com/reviews/reviewid98.php "professional" reviews?
- Blogcritics is an online magazine; FilmSchoolRejects has a staff of writers going on two years; Tuenlab certainly seems to approve everything they post.
"Crahan reportedly watched and analysed all of the footage recorded for the DVD" - reportedly? He did or he didn't...
"However in contrast to Disasterpeices this DVD was intended..." - can you throw some commas in here...
"Throughout the movie whenever the band members appear unmasked, their faces are blurred, where as on the second disc, during the interviews, they are completely revealed" - I'd have thought that would belong more in the first section...
"Dawn called the DVD "an audible treat for thrash and speed metal fans", he went on to compliment.." - Dawn is the guy's name? The "he" needs clarifcation.
"Ultimate Guitar called the DVD..." - should it have italics?
- Same for Blogcritics... check all the reception section for that.

And yeah, that's about it... leave me a note when you're done. Cheers. —Giggy 12:46, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think I got 'em all. Thanks! Black ngold29 16:47, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

This GAN has passed, and this is now a good article! If you found this review helpful, please consider helping out a fellow editor by reviewing another good article nomination. Help and advice on how to do so is available at Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles, and you can ask for the help of a GAN mentor, if you wish.

Cheers, —Giggy 09:48, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Voliminal: Inside the Nine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100501065534/http://www.cria.ca/cert_db_search.php to http://www.cria.ca/cert_db_search.php
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.dawn.com/weekly///images/archive/070408/images7.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Voliminal: Inside the Nine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/voliminal/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:03, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Voliminal: Inside the Nine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:50, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Voliminal: Inside the Nine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:42, 20 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic