Talk:Volvariella surrecta
Latest comment: 12 years ago by BriannaMaxim in topic GA Review
 | Volvariella surrecta has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 16, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the piggyback rosegill mushroom grows parasitically on other mushrooms? | |||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Volvariella surrecta/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 23:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, I'll reveiw this - looks very interesting! MathewTownsend (talk) 23:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- review
This is a very nice article. I've made a few copy edits[1], hopefully ok with you.
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
- b. complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:
- b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:y
- c. no original research:
- a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
- fair representation without bias:
- fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- no edit wars, etc:
- no edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass!
- Pass or Fail:
Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 20:45, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review and copyedits Mathew! Sasata (talk) 21:32, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
- I also made a few copy edit changes that I hope are all right. If I have done something wrong, please let me know since I am new to editing on Wikipedia. Thank you! BriannaMaxim (talk) 23:08, 16 July 2012 (UTC)