Talk:Voretigene neparvovec
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Rod57 in topic adisinsight.springer.com refs look like advertising
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Voretigene neparvovec article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Voretigene neparvovec.
|
Needs update, Dec 17
editIdeally by an expert. See 2017 in science for details and references. --mfb (talk) 08:56, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- That's a big page; which bits are relevant to this article ? - Rod57 (talk) 14:42, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
More info on development
editI think that because this is the first gene therapy, it would be nice to have a lot of info about the development, which seems to be removed from a lot of drug articles. Natureium (talk) 16:27, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
adisinsight.springer.com refs look like advertising
editThe adisinsight.springer.com ref is just a link to an undated (and changing) summary page asking for payment. Would it be unreasonable to ask for a better (ideally free) source ? - Rod57 (talk) 14:46, 21 December 2017 (UTC)