Talk:Vortigaunt/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Zxcvbnm in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

  • Well-written:
  • (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct -   Prose seems fine.
    (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation -   Sections, etc. comply with manual of style.
  • Verifiable with no original research:
  • (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline -  
    (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose) -   Fully referenced from reliable sources.
    (c) it contains no original research -   No game guide content/OR
  • Broad in its coverage:
  • (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic 
    (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style) 
  • Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each -  
  • Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute -  
  • Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  • (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content -  
    (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions -   All images are relevant to the article.

    Overall:   This article passes the Good Article Criteria.--ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:19, 18 September 2009 (UTC)Reply