Talk:Voter apathy
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Murat39e. Peer reviewers: Lubnasebastian, Jurgen.Prambs.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:45, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2020 and 2 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ningjiang216.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:45, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
New section: civic technology
editFirst there's some info that could be added to the end of the background section:
On the other hand, Hunter College professor Jamie Chandler claims that voter apathy, or disinterest in the political system, is overstated in regards to socioeconomic factors.[1] Wealth and educational attainment correlate most strongly with voter participation.
I also think there's potential for a subsection on civic tech, see below.
New section:
Civic Technology
editCivic technology seeks to counteract the effects of voter apathy through more modern means, such as social media, applications, and websites. Many startups within the field of civic technology attempt to connect voters to politicians and government, in an attempt to boost voter participation and turnout. Examples include PopVox[2] in the United States and mySociety[3] in the United Kingdom. A John S. and James L. Knight Foundation report found that $431 million had been invested in civic tech as a whole from January 2011 through May 2013, with $4 million specifically invested in voting technologies.[4] Murat39e (talk) 19:05, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Why is There so Much Voter Apathy in U.S. Elections?". International Business Times. 2011-09-19. Retrieved 2016-11-05.
- ^ "Its YOUR VOICE. Step up. Get informed. Be heard". www.popvox.com. Retrieved 2016-11-05.
- ^ "About / mySociety". mySociety. Retrieved 2016-11-05.
- ^ "Knight Foundation: Trends in Civic Tech". www.knightfoundation.org. Retrieved 2016-11-05.
- Added reference template to avoid refs getting sucked into following section. -- FeRD_NYC (talk) 17:16, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Background section claim on voter apathy
editThe Background section contains the following claim, with citation:
Apathy was lower in the 2008 election, which featured a competitive election for president.[1]
References
- ^ Guy Gugliotta (November 3, 2004). "Politics In, Voter Apathy Out Amid Heavy Turnout". Washington Post. Retrieved 2009-10-01.
The issue there is, I hope, obvious, since a 2004 news article is hardly a useful citation for claims about the 2008 election's competitiveness or voter apathy levels. -- FeRD_NYC (talk) 17:15, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Merge Voter apathy into Political apathy
edit | The contents of the Voter apathy page were merged into Political apathy on 11 June 2023 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Reason: overlapping meaning HudecEmil (talk) 10:46, 11 June 2023 (UTC)