Talk:Vulvectomy

No sources at all

This article sounds authoritative and knowledgable, but has no references, sources, or citations. Someone could be making it all up -- or not, depending on who they are. But either way, and no matter who wrote this entry, references and sources must be added. Just sounding authoritative isn't good enough. So I added an {{original research}} tag. Timothy Perper (talk) 08:05, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

I just checked the edit history of the page. The article was written first by an anonymous editor who gave only an IP as an identifier. Other anonymous editors have added material as well, plus some cleanup editing by registered editors. So unless this article can be documented -- and I mean documented, not just asserted -- it probably should be deleted as completely untrustworthy. And no, it is NOT my responsibility to supply references. Timothy Perper (talk) 08:19, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

This article isn't made up and it should not be deleted, though I agree it absolutely needs to be improved upon with references. — Guillaume Pelletier ~ 17:46, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Factual errors

I am a physician assistant in gynecologic oncology. This page contains several factual errors. I hope to work on the page soon, but don't have time to do it right now... Csnyoung (talk) 18:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)