Talk:W. H. Burford & Sons
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Laterthanyouthink in topic Confusion about history
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the W. H. Burford & Sons article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
.svg){kind=small} | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Why should this article be split?
editImagine News Corp. article is having whole biography of Rupert Murdoch. Awkward. JSH-alive/talk/cont/mail 17:56, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- It has been suggested that this article be split into multiple articles accessible from a disambiguation page.
- It has been suggested by whom?
- Where is this suggestion?
- What are the reasons for this suggestion?
- What are the reasons for the split?
- What would the disambiguation page be called?
- What are the pages it would be split into, and what would be their names?
- Please explain. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:03, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Today, I suggest this article be split into W. H. Burford & Son (the company), W. H. Burford (the person) and William Burford (his son) because I believe the current situation of this article is against Wikipedia's policy. Enough? JSH-alive/talk/cont/mail 14:07, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- What would the disambiguation page be called?
- I believe the current situation of this article is against Wikipedia's policy. - Which policy or policies?
- Pdfpdf (talk) 16:00, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- What would be gained by splitting? Not readability. It's not (and never will be) a huge article. Doug butler (talk) 15:05, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Confusion about history
editI don't have time to investigate now, but the histories seem to be confused as per this WP article (which needs better citing), the info in this one and the info attached to this photo. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:37, 26 April 2019 (UTC)