Talk:WAGR P and Pr classes

Australia: Western Australia / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal WAGR P and Pr classes is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains: Locomotives Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	October 5, 2010

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

New Page

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Today I created this page in its entirety, infoboxes, references, bibliography. The information comes from my older arts WAGR P and WAGR Pr classes to which I was the only contributor, so I dont believe my redirects will upset anyone. Regards, Corporal29 (talk) 02:28, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Great article

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Great article - well done. There is some conjecture re the claim the Pmr was a rough rider because of some design fault. I spoke with people within HVTR (as well as old WAGR staff) when I was there once, and the opinion was that, on good track (ie up the Avon Valley) the Pm was a good rider - the only difference between the Pm and Pmr was the bearings. THe belief is that, when in service, the WAGR track was, er, average, and thus did not provide a good ride.Sulzer55 (talk) 11:30, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic