Talk:WHO-convened Global Study of Origins of SARS-CoV-2

WHO-convened study sources

Below is a list of WP:RS that anyone may add adding to this page. LondonIP (talk) 00:15, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

1. "Australia insists WHO inquiry into Covid origin must be robust, despite China tensions", The Guardian, 28 Dec 2020
2. "'Major stones unturned': COVID origin search must continue after WHO report, say scientists", Nature Magazine, 10 Feb 2021
3. "Covid Origin Probe Debate Heats Up as Scientists Protest", Bloomberg News, 4 March 2021
4. "Exclusive: WHO Investigators to Scrap Plans for Interim Report on Probe of Covid-19 Origins", The Daily Telegraph, 5 March 2021
5. "Exclusive: Contentious Hunt for Covid's Origin Points to China Animal Trade", Bloomberg News, 20 March 2021
6. "Exclusive: WHO Covid-19 origins report says lab leak 'extremely unlikely'", The Daily Telegraph, 29 March 2021
7. "WHO Wuhan report leaves question of coronavirus origins unresolved", The Washington Post, 29 March 2021
8. "UK and US criticise WHO's Covid report and accuse China of withholding data", The Guardian, 30 March 2021
9. "'Compromise' WHO report resolves little on pandemic's origins, but details probe's next steps", Science Magazine, 30 March 2021
10. "The WHO Report On COVID-19's Origins Shows We May Never Know Where The Coronavirus Came From", BuzzFeed News, 30 March 2021
11. "What the WHO Investigation Reveals About the Origins of COVID-19", Foreign Affairs, 31 March 2021

Orphaned references in WHO-convened Global Study of Origins of SARS-CoV-2

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of WHO-convened Global Study of Origins of SARS-CoV-2's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "WHOconvened":

• From Investigations into the origin of COVID-19: "Virus origin / Origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus". www.who.int. Retrieved 23 June 2021. WHO-convened Global Study of the Origins of SARS-CoV-2
• From COVID-19 lab leak theory: WHO-convened global study of origins of SARS-CoV-2: China Part (PDF) (Report). World Health Organization. 6 April 2021. pp. 7–10. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 June 2021. Retrieved 4 August 2021.

Reference named "NY Times July 2021":

• From COVID-19 lab leak theory: Buckley, Chris (22 July 2021). "China denounces the W.H.O.'s call for another look at the Wuhan lab as 'shocking' and 'arrogant.'". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 22 July 2021. Retrieved 23 July 2021.
• From Investigations into the origin of COVID-19: Buckley, Chris (22 July 2021). "China denounces the W.H.O.'s call for another look at the Wuhan lab as 'shocking' and 'arrogant.'". The New York Times. Retrieved 23 July 2021.

Reference named "CNN July 2021":

• From Investigations into the origin of COVID-19: Ben Westcott, Isaac Yee and Yong Xiong. "Chinese government rejects WHO plan for second phase of Covid-19 origins study". CNN. Retrieved 23 July 2021.
• From COVID-19 lab leak theory: Westcott, Ben; Yee, Isaac; Xiong, Yong (2021-07-22). "Chinese government rejects WHO plan for second phase of Covid-19 origins study". CNN. Archived from the original on 23 July 2021. Retrieved 23 July 2021.

Reference named "APNews20210211":

• From Wuhan Institute of Virology: Fujiyama, Emily Wang; Moritsugu, Ken (11 February 2021). "EXPLAINER: What the WHO coronavirus experts learned in Wuhan". AP News. Archived from the original on 27 February 2021. Retrieved 12 February 2021.
• From Investigations into the origin of COVID-19: Fujiyama, Emily Wang; Moritsugu, Ken (11 February 2021). "EXPLAINER: What the WHO coronavirus experts learned in Wuhan". Associated Press News. Archived from the original on 27 February 2021. Retrieved 12 February 2021.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:02, 24 November 2021 (UTC)