Tone

edit

Besides the fact that the majority of the "controversy" is unsourced, the whole section reads more like a gossip column than an encyclopedia, right down to the concluding "Classic radio!" Unless the section can be sourced and the tone improved, it should probably be removed. --Moonriddengirl 23:58, 31 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Removing Information for Sake of Removing

edit

Why should we remove information for the sake of it. An encyclopedia should include as much information as possible. This is not listing information, this is extrapolating on the station. 76.125.203.191 (talk) 04:32, 2 August 2009 (UTC) Concerned readerReply

For all the schedule information that was removed (most of it out of date anyway), please see WP:NOT#DIR. - NeutralHomerTalk04:35, 2 August 2009 (UTC)Reply