Talk:WKSK (AM)

Latest comment: 16 years ago by BetacommandBot in topic Fair use rationale for Image:WKSI logo.jpg

Question about signal strength

edit

I recall the station's upgrade from 1kW to 5kW occurring when the station switched frequencies from 1600 kHz to 580 kHz. But the Business North Carolina article, published in 2002, indicates the jump to 5kW happened just a year earlier, which would have been 2001. I've not been able to find a history of station changes on the FCC's site. DL77 20:10, 23 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

On further reflection, the station's initial power must have been only 500 watts, and the initial jump in signal strength was to 1,000 watts. I definitely recall that the change from 1600 kHz to 580 kHz was due to the increase in watts. DL77 14:28, 24 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:WKSI logo.jpg

edit
 

Image:WKSI logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 10:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply