Talk:WOHA

Sections by topic

This is referring to the actual 'prose'. Revent (talk) 02:07, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyvio note

A detection of http://www.architecture-online.org/2013/03/woha-architects-impressive-park-royal-tower-in-singapore/ is a false positive. The text that matches was on Wikipedia for over a year before the blog was posted. Revent (talk) 02:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on WOHA. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120220170044/http://www.worldbuildingsdirectory.com/project.cfm?id=1780 to http://www.worldbuildingsdirectory.com/project.cfm?id=1780

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Architecture

As part of the WikiProject Architecture to nurture architecture articles' quality, this article will be over the next weeks corrected and completed according to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not to improve its quality and standards. Any suggestions/sources/references are welcome.

--City-Reader (talk) 11:39, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

According to the corrections made by myself and others over the past couple of weeks as part of the WikiProject Architecture, I believe the issues previously affecting the page according to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not have been resolved and the Template:Advert can be removed according to the guidelines Help:Maintenance template removal. Any comments/suggestions welcome. --City-Reader (talk) 16:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)