Talk:WSJ Magazine

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on WSJ.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080906202510/http://www.dowjones.com:80/Pressroom/PressKits/WSJpresskit/WSJ_presskit.htm to http://www.dowjones.com/Pressroom/PressKits/WSJpresskit/WSJ_presskit.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:42, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Podcasts?

Is this related to WSJ Podcasts or the Panoply Network? Morganfitzp (talk) 03:46, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 25 April 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} 14:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

---

WSJ. → WSJ Magazine – The proposed title would match the self-published nameplate on the website (see here). There is no dot after "WSJ" in some independent cited sources either (e.g. Financial Times, and The New York Times article with Needleman in the headline). The styling with the dot is rather unusual and MOS:TM applies. Notice that the nameplate of the parent newspaper also includes a terminating dot (see here), which is not included in the title of the corresponding Wikipedia article. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 10:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

• Support In ictu oculi (talk) 13:21, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
• Support Per nom, seems like the WP:NATURAL alternate name to use in lieu of being able to use "WSJ.". ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:11, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
• Support per nom. 〜 Festucalex • talk 06:00, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA concerns

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are listed below:

• The layout of this article is very usual, and it is difficult to find the history of this topic.
• There is not much post-2008 information in the article. The article should be updated with more recent information about this publication.

Is anyone willing to address these issues, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 03:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)