Talk:WSJ Magazine
 | WSJ Magazine has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 13, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the readership of the new Dow Jones & Company magazine, WSJ., has average household assets of US$2.9 million? | |||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | On 25 April 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from WSJ. to WSJ Magazine. The result of the discussion was moved. |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on WSJ.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080906202510/http://www.dowjones.com:80/Pressroom/PressKits/WSJpresskit/WSJ_presskit.htm to http://www.dowjones.com/Pressroom/PressKits/WSJpresskit/WSJ_presskit.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:42, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Podcasts?
editIs this related to WSJ Podcasts or the Panoply Network? Morganfitzp (talk) 03:46, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 25 April 2023
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 14:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
WSJ. → WSJ Magazine – The proposed title would match the self-published nameplate on the website (see here). There is no dot after "WSJ" in some independent cited sources either (e.g. Financial Times, and The New York Times article with Needleman in the headline). The styling with the dot is rather unusual and MOS:TM applies. Notice that the nameplate of the parent newspaper also includes a terminating dot (see here), which is not included in the title of the corresponding Wikipedia article. — BarrelProof (talk) 10:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support In ictu oculi (talk) 13:21, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support Per nom, seems like the WP:NATURAL alternate name to use in lieu of being able to use "WSJ.". ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:11, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. 〜 Festucalex • talk 06:00, 28 April 2023 (UTC)