Talk:WTVN

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).

Radio Stations Low‑importance

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WTVN nighttime signal

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Tonight I heard WTVN in London, Ontario, quite clearly. Normally one would expect to get CKTB from St. Catharines on 610 AM. Mjlarochelle 05:18, 26 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Early predecessors and their frequencies

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I can't find evidence of 640 as the frequency for WBAV. The evidence I've found is that before May 15, 1923 the station used th common 833kHz frequency that all tation were assigned, then went to 770, 710, and 1020 before changing its call to WAIU. In turn, WAIU continued on 1020 for a while but changed to 1060 by June '27. -- BRG (talk) 19:47, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Financial Results

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"The manager purchased the station along with channel 6 and changed the calls to WTVN, the existing TV calls. In the end WTVN made more money after expenses than the TV purchase."

NOT TRUE. Former Taft President Lawrence H. Rogers states that WTVN-TV was always a strong performer and the third-most profitable broadcast operation in the entire company, wheras WTVN-AM was losing ghastly amounts of money in the 1960's when Rogers was hired. Likewise, WSYX is said to be Sinclair Broadcasting's most profitable operation.

"History of U.S. Television a Personal Reminiscence" by Lawrence H. Rogers II (Page 337) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.60.241.48 (talk) 00:16, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic