![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on WV22. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061130154734/http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2004/676/he1.htm to http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2004/676/he1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:42, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Calf's head
edit"It contained small pottery vessels, a carved wooden knot, and a wooden rocker which were all placed in a rush basket; the head of a calf was placed on top."
If that was a genuine calf's head, it would have rotted away by now. So what material was it? Monado (talk) 12:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Monado: Yes it was an actual calf head. The flesh had rotted away but the bones were still present : ) Merytat3n (talk) 02:21, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Should we use "calf skull," then? Monado (talk) 12:00, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Sure. Done : ) Merytat3n (talk) 07:02, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Should we use "calf skull," then? Monado (talk) 12:00, 16 October 2023 (UTC)