Talk:WVLA-TV

Coming 2007

Ok, never mind! I do have sources now. thank you.68.155.82.169 02:47, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

White Knight is no longer for sale, so I'm removing the note in the infobox. 67.33.201.173 15:13, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

I caught an article in Thursday's Baton Rouge Advocate saying a judge told White Knight's leaders that they must file reorganization papers by March 14. - --Bdj95 19:17, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Overhaul

I removed a section that was purely speculative (on why the owner dumped the news department); that requires sourcing if we're going to say it. (WP:V) Not having a local newscast is not a unique situation -- while it's certainly not common, going over who does and who doesn't is impractical. I also took out the TV schedule (WP:NOT a TV guide), and overhauled trivia -- except for Letterman (which still needs to be sourced), none of these are unique situations that merit mention in an encyclopedia. Amnewsboy 15:46, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:NBC33news-baton-rouge.jpg

Image:NBC33news-baton-rouge.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material

Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:

1. WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information." As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.
2. As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced.
3. WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article.
4. Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.

If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 13:37, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on WVLA-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160119104213/http://www.cajunfirst.com:80/news/local-news/nexstar-broadcastings-klaf-tv-to-become-first-nbc-network-affiliate-serving-lafayette to http://www.cajunfirst.com/news/local-news/nexstar-broadcastings-klaf-tv-to-become-first-nbc-network-affiliate-serving-lafayette
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:07, 21 July 2016 (UTC)