Talk:WWE '13
Roster Announced
editTHQ have announced the official roster which was leaked. The roster is -
WWE Superstars/Divas:
-Alberto Del Rio -Alicia Fox -Beth Phoenix -Big Show -Booker T -Brie Bella -Brock Lesnar -Brodus Clay -CM Punk -Chris Jericho -Christian -Cody Rhodes -Daniel Bryan -David Otunga -Dolph Ziggler -Epico -Eve -Heath Slater -Hunico -Jack Swagger -Jinder Mahal -John Cena -Justin Gabriel -Kane -Kelly Kelly -Kevin Nash -Kharma -Kofi Kingston -Mark Henry -Nikki Bella -Primo -R-Truth -Randy Orton -Rey Mysterio -Santino Marella -Sheamus -Sin Cara -Ted DiBiase -The Great Khali -The Miz -The Rock -Triple H -Undertaker -Wade Barrett -Zack Ryder
WWE Legends:
-Animal -Big Bossman -Big Show (Attitude Era) -Billy Gunn -Bret Hart -British Bulldog -Cactus Jack -Chris Jericho (Attitude Era) -Christian (Attitude Era) -Dude Love -Eddie Guerrero -Edge -Godfather -Hawk -Kane (Attitude Era) -Ken Shamrock -Lita -Mankind -Mark Henry (Attitude Era) -Mike Tyson -Mr. McMahon -Road Dogg -Shane McMahon -Shawn Michaels -Stephanie McMahon -Stone Cold -The Rock (Attitude Era) -Triple H (Attitude Era) -Trish Stratus -Undertaker (Attitude Era) -Vader -X-Pac
— Preceding unsigned comment added by WWEFan95 (talk • contribs)
PROTECTION
editI hate not being able to edit as anybody else, but people are copying+pasting information and posting assumptions. We need to protect it so that information is posted with sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.9.253.197 (talk) 20:22, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
German
editCan someone Translate it on german? -- Wwefreak95 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:06, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
FROM THE THQ SITE =
editNumber of Attitude Wrestlers - 32 Number of Divas - 7 Number of Superstars - 38 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.28.169.249 (talk) 16:42, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Adding rosters is against Wikipedia:Fancruft
editIt was stated in Talk:WWE All Stars yet people keep adding rosters, is there a way to prevent any of this? I suggest protection but I doubt there's enough edits to be approved 76.26.179.26 (talk) 15:02, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Please check this out!! Talk:Wrestling Games Rosters. Thanks. Kane (talk) 18:24, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Special Referee Match?
editI noticed that the Special Referee match section was deleted, however this match has been 100 percent confirmed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WWETNA12 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Protected Article
editMay I suggest that the article be protected in order to stop users (namely User:Mikeymike2001) from defiling others hard work & contributions? Kane (talk) 18:06, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
WWF Scratch logo
editWill the WWF scratch logo be used during the Attitude Era sections of the game? As of 2012 WWE is legally allowed to use it so I don't see why it wouldn't but I just want someone to clarify it. Thanks, K. (talk) 12:02, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Different Versions
editNone of the articles on any of the games in this series provide enough information on the different versions of the games that have been released - such as which version has what content, and what differs between them. Each version should have a separate heading, detailing what that version has, and what it has that others do not, or what it has in addition to other versions. This is an important factor that in my opinion is a stub in all of the articles related to games in this series. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.133.54.218 (talk) 13:00, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Dispute regarding adding Roster name
editThere has been a small disagreement between me and User:Megastar201 about adding the character names to this article. This is what I have said, so if anyone agrees or disagree with me then please feel free to state it. It isn't against any policies or rules to add rosters to an encyclopedic article. The talk page of WWE'13 refers to the incorrect policy. It refers to Fancruft, which in a nutshell is: Avoid including information that is trivial and of importance only to a small population of fans. Besides Roster listing isn't applicable. Since my edit no one has corrected me, if you still think you're right feel free to consult any of the admin here. Rovinemessage 09:36, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on WWE '13. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120713072501/http://www.play.com/Games/Xbox360/4-/32247169/0/WWE-13/ListingDetails.html to http://www.play.com/Games/Xbox360/4-/32247169/0/WWE-13/ListingDetails.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120819042239/http://www.inentertainment.co.uk/20120817/confirmed-of-wwe-13-attitude-era-unlockables/ to http://www.inentertainment.co.uk/20120817/confirmed-of-wwe-13-attitude-era-unlockables/
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://ringsidegaming.com/2012/08/wwe-13-jim-ross-in-attitude-era-mode-only/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:07, 15 February 2022 (UTC)