Talk:WaHu Student Apartments
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Kingsif in topic Did you know nomination
![]() | WaHu Student Apartments has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 8, 2021. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the construction of WaHu Student Apartments was delayed for one year by Minneapolis's initial rejection of a new location for the blood plasma donation center on the property? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kingsif (talk) 21:32, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the construction of WaHu Student Apartments was delayed one year by Minneapolis's initial rejection of a new location for the blood plasma donation center on the property? Source: https://finance-commerce.com/2013/09/wahu-student-housing-project-clears-final-hurdle/
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/2020 United States men's Olympic basketball team
- Comment: I am nominating this as a courtesy for Carbrera, who is dealing with RL issues, and will not be counting this toward my DYKs.
Improved to Good Article status by Carbrera (talk). Nominated by Sammi Brie (talk) at 21:24, 16 July 2021 (UTC).
- Article was nominated the day of it's GA promotion; Article has not appeared on the front page before; Article is long and developed enough; References meet criteria; Hook suffices; QPQ met. This is my first DYK review. If I have demonstrated incompetence, please let me know. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 11:26, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- That looks good to me, Vami_IV. I've done 400+ reviews; I can be laconic, but I do find the issues that are there. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 16:08, 31 July 2021 (UTC)