Talk:Waipoua Forest

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Forestry (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry articles

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Waipoua Forest Trust was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 15 December 2010 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Waipoua Forest. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Waipoua Forest Trust was copied or moved into Waipoua Forest with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Untitled

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I have a number of resources to contribute here: - A video of the forest, including specific coverage of Waipoua Forest. - A geocache right there (w/ lots of useful information), as well as at two other nearby locations of relevance. I therefore propose the following inclusions under external links:

Look Out Waipoua! - A nearby Faber Optimé geocache in the Waipoua Forest.
Northland Secrets Early Rizers Mix - A short Faber Optimé YouTube film about Tāne Mahuta and the Northland region.

Under ==See also==

God of the Forest - A Faber Optimé geocache at Tāne Mahuta.
Te Matua Ngahere - A nearby Faber Optimé geocache at Te Matua Ngahere.

Faber Optimé (talk) 08:28, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oppose. As has been explained to you by several people at User talk:Faber Optimé, you should not be linking to your own work, and all those who have reviewed your videos to date appear to have agreed that they are not suitable as links. Geocaching links are also not suitable-gadfium 20:20, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I was going to move the Warawara forest reference in the Waipoua Forest page to a new Warawara forest page - they are completely separate forests LawrieM (talk) 21:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Re-write needed

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can someone please edit this article. It is full of non sequiturs, poor grammar and rather childish commentary.122.59.209.73 (talk) 10:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Waipoua Forest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:42, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Waipoua Forest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:05, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hatnote

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

This topic is to discuss the creation of a disambiguation page or the addition of a hatnote to direct users looking for the article for the spider genus of the same name. I'd like to keep the hatnote in for now, because it's much easier to erase the hatnote from one article than to have an entire disambig page deleted (unless you happen to be a user with that power).

The page Waipoua currently redirects to Waipoua Forest, but there is an article about the spider genus of the same name on the page Waipoua (spider) and no way to direct users to that page (or any indication that the page even exists). There will inevitably be people looking for the article about the spider found in this forest, so the question is whether to create a disambiguation page at "Waipoua" or a hatnote on this page.

"Waipoua Forest" is the primary topic here, but I don't think creating a disambiguation page is necessary. See WP:Hatnotes are cheap. In fact, I think far more users will be looking for the article on the forest rather than the spider, so using a disambig page will make these people go through an additional step to find it. Adding a hatnote is my vote because I feel that it's the least disruptive way to direct the few people looking for the spider page, but I'm not an expert on the rules by any means. Sesame honey tart 14:52, 10 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I suggest simply changing the page Waipoua from a redirect page to a disambiguation page - linking to both Waipoua Forest and Waipoua (spider). Ross Finlayson (talk) 14:56, 10 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I suppose I don't understand why the hatnote is a problem in the first place. If it seems invasive, I can move the spider to its name and add a hatnote there directing users to the forest page, but it depends on how many people will type in "Waipoua" looking for "Waipoua Forest"? Sesame honey tart 15:08, 10 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

The issue is that nobody is likely to type in "Waipoua Forest" if they are looking for a spider. Therefore, a hatnote pointing to Waipoua (spider) doesn't make much sense on the Waipoua Forest page. However, it's possible that someone might type in "Waipoua" if they are looking for a spider - or for the forest. That's why I suggest replacing the contents of the Waipoua page - removing the redirect tag, and simply replacing the contents with a disambiguation list (to both Waipoua Forest and Waipoua (spider). Ross Finlayson (talk) 15:45, 10 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have modified the hatnote to address the redirect specifically. If this is not satisfactory, I have no problem if my change is reverted.-gadfium 21:32, 10 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic