This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article was accepted on 8 March 2015 by reviewer DGG (talk·contribs).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The lede, and other sources such as the link at American frontier#Asians, are worded as though there were 23 people, one of whom was a woman and the remainder of which were samurai. But the body of the article refers to Schnell's family "and 22 other samurai families" being brought to the US. The most frequently used reference in the article is dead, and one of the only working links I could find with reference to the number is the NRHP application, which says:
According to the 1870 U.S. census, there were 55 Japanese in the United States. Of these, 22 were colonists at Wakamatsu: 14 men, 6 women, and 2 children
Since this is the most precise count, I'm inclined to believe it. If so, it's not correct to say 22 samurai, much less 22 families, but something like "22 people from samurai families" should do. I'll make the change here and the other few articles that use the "22 samurai" idea. --BDD (talk) 21:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
