Talk:Wakefield Kirkgate railway station

Ticket usage

As with the ongoing discussion of ticket usage, apparently Kirkgate during the 2004-2005 period only had 372 users - just over 1 user a day. Obviously this figure is very wrong.:-) :) Simply south 23:05, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

I agree, I have deleted these figures and hopefully someone will substitute the correct ones. --JustinSmith (talk) 20:26, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

The figures are "correct", in that they are the officially reported figures from the Office of Rail Regulation. I have therefore re-instated them. Newer statistics use a different methodology and therefore more accurately reflect the usage, and this is explained in the article. NRTurner (talk) 08:28, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

That is ridiculous the figures are obviously wrong or, at an absolute minimum, totally misleading. It`s at times like this that I wonder whether Wikipedia is a bit of a joke, but I can`t be bothered to get into a revision war.--JustinSmith (talk) 15:31, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

There is absolutely no way that a city centre station like this, with direct services to Leeds, Huddersfield and Sheffield, would see fewer than 1000 passengers per year. Maybe that's the "official" figure, which has been used to prepare the "official" excuse for making it unstaffed? To me, they appear to be out by a factor of 1000. That is, if they were 0.372 million, 0.564 million and 0.769 million, they'd appear much more realistic - so perhaps the person compiling the source data simply "forgot" to type the "0." part? --Redrose64 (talk) 16:46, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

As I have said previously here, the methodology has changed. I imagine in the past any tickets to 'Wakefield Stations' would have been taken to mean Wakefield Westgate until recently, hence the jump up to almost half a million passengers in 2008/9 when the statistics were gathered more carefully. We should keep the statistics in there as they are official numbers from ORR, but some text in the main article should explain the anomaly. NRTurner (talk) 09:30, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Service alterations

I have made alterations to the train services through Wakefield Kirkgate as the Huddersfield services no longer head out to Leeds. They are advertised and announced as terminating at Huddersfield. Northern Rail no longer serve Selby from Wakefield Kirkgate. M J Duly 17:08, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Wakefield Kirkgate railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110708091705/http://wakeysignals.bravehost.com/demo.html to http://wakeysignals.bravehost.com/demo.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:29, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wakefield Kirkgate railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090225002313/http://www.wakefield.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/EC7F3485-64A8-4D27-B478-7DB069212F91/0/Listed_buildings_26th_April_2005.pdf to http://www.wakefield.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/EC7F3485-64A8-4D27-B478-7DB069212F91/0/Listed_buildings_26th_April_2005.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:16, 1 December 2017 (UTC)