Talk:Waleed Al-Husseini

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Wing in topic Translation into Chinese Wikipedia

Waleed is involved in plagiarizing

edit

"Plot Spoiler" has been reverting my following addition, first from the Article and now even from this Talk Page although it has both the copy of Waleed's blog post and the post of Reuters' website. They are identical and Reuters is clearly a trusted source, and therefore the original. His blog used as a source in the article is full of plagiarization, from online sources easily detected if one googles some of its content, this is just one example.

@Plot Spoiler, do you really think Reuters has stolen the article from Waleed's blog?

As there is no third choice

Why are you trying to silence debate about it even here?

I opened a request at the dispute resolution noticeboard about it..

"Waleed has been accused of plagiarizing much of the posts of his blogs, in English and more in Arabic, he claimed authorship of articles written by other writers, e.g. the whole article on Reuters' website entitled "The Higgs particle - what it is and what it does" written by Chris Wickham[14] is exactly copied and claimed to be written by Waleed at his English blog called "Proud Atheist" [15].

[14] http://mobile.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSBRE86306W20120704 OR http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/04/us-science-higgs-explanation-idUSBRE86306W20120704

[15] http://proud-a.blogspot.fr/2012/07/higgs-particle-what-it-is-and-what-it.html

For more information about the problem and the importance of mentioning it in the article, see the discussion on Waleed starting from Reply #7 in the subject "French Council of Ex-Muslims" at http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=23309.0

Atheerkt (talk) 23:02, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Request for Comments

edit

There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.

The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.

Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:38, 25 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Translation into Chinese Wikipedia

edit

The version 05:09, 9 June 2023‎ Portwoman of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia to expand an existing article.--Wing (talk) 06:36, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply