Talk:Wallace Sampson

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative medicine

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles

Untitled

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is clearly about a man who is a forceful and vigorous campaigner for his chosen cause. Perhaps in the course of editing the impression will be removed that it has been written as if presenting Arrowsmith dressed as Elmer Gantry or the other way about. Qexigator (talk) 00:21, 25 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re Bullrangifer's edit comment

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Re - "TRENDS IN THE RISE OF THE “ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE" MOVEMENT: Fix. Didn't even know this article existed! - Bullrangifer"

It is the fourth source listed, deleted from the lead along with the other first ten sources, reducing the lead to the current nonsense version from that of BullRangifer here. It appears that after the article was scrubbed of content over the past few months, since the admin's IP edit block, none of the REMAINING "contributing" editors bothered to read these sources before removing these seminal sources and the content supported by them, wiping the article down to the current nonsense version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.178.73 (talk) 03:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Not notable.

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I don't understand why this person merits a Wikipage.

He has historically been called "..biased and without credibility.." by US judges: ref. Los Angeles Superior Court 2003 (NCAHF vs. King Bio - appeal).

There is little, if any, content on this page and web research brings up allegations that at least some of his self-acclaimed academic credentials are false, plus the fact that he has published at least one online propaganda piece extolling the virtues of the well-known (in Scientology circles) freezone Scientologist and originator of Dianetics, R. de Mille.

This page should be removed, in my opinion. 92.24.212.38 (talk) 01:25, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Former Chair

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Is it usual to say about deceased persons that they were "former Chair" of something?

Sampson was Chair, then he wasn't, and then he died. So "he was Chair" and "he was former Chair". Why is the later status of being an ex-Chair more important than the earlier status of being a Chair? Sounds weird to me. --Hob Gadling (talk) 15:06, 27 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Works for me, as it indicates that he didn't die in office. Bromley86 (talk) 01:08, 28 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic