Talk:Walter Korpi

@Mccapra: Hi, check if it's "understandable" right now..--Mcapdevila (talk) 12:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

@Mcapdevila:} not really! The paradox as stated isn’t a paradox. Mccapra (talk) 12:49, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Guessing at what it might mean - countries achieve higher levels of equality if they have lower levels of formal income redistribution through taxes? Not sure if that’s what is intended but it’s not clear what the actual paradox is. Mccapra (talk) 12:51, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

i will try to get the origiginal work, understand it, and compress it i two lines.. but you should change the label to "clarify", because now the text it's very readable & understandable, the only thing it's that what it describes are the two sides of a controversy not a parodoxal fact..----Mcapdevila (talk) 13:29, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

@Mccapra: Welw, at the end.. I have removed the text in conflict and added a Jstor link, so there is no reason for the label..------Mcapdevila (talk) 13:56, 13 December 2021 (UTC)