Talk:War Industries Board
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Dubito, ergo cogito, ergo sum in topic Original members?
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change Format?
editCan someone change the format? I don't think wikipedia endorses the "school report" format with an included bibliography
- Done. If that material belongs in Wikipedia, it belongs in the individual articles. If anyone wants to move it, it's still in the article history. The very first sentence I checked was incorrect, so I didn't bother. - Crosbiesmith (talk) 21:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Biased
editIt seems very biased, and leftist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.233.83.120 (talk) 19:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- The remark itself appears to be biased; without a point of reference, examples. The section is not helpful nor constructive. Moreover, it is unsigned and old (2008). I nominate that this section be deleted. RWymant@lk 17:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Lack of information
editThe article fails to address the ending of the War Industries Board.
- I know most of that history. I'm actively looking for sources to cite. RWymant@lk 17:21, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Original members?
editThe text says "seven" original members of the board, but the bullet points list eight. Dgorsline (talk) 12:40, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Dgorsline, good point, I did some research and found the 7 original members in American Industry in the War: A Report of the War Industries Board. New York: Prentice-Hall, p.22.Dubito, ergo cogito, ergo sum (talk) 03:28, 10 April 2018 (UTC)