Talk:Warcraft III World Editor

Untitled

Excuse me, but how is it A map made with Wc3 World Editor and A scripting language only useful when used in conjunction with Wc3 World Editor are notable enough for wikipedia while the tool itself isn't notable enough? Vexorian (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

• Please don't remove other people's posts in this discussion page. Here's some context to this 2009 post. I did not mean to say that WE is not notable, but rather the opposite. When I made this post, Warcraft III World Editor's page was removed for not "being notable enough", I made this post to complain about the removal. Because it did not make sense that a simple mod created with WE was notable enough to have its own page, yet the tool that made it did not deserve such thing... After this, I assembled some people from wc3c to remake the page. Vexorian (talk) 15:55, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Rewrote much of the article and replaced the stub template with an expansion template. (For a topic such as a level editor, I believe it's got enough content to not be a stub.) Casablanca2000in (talk) 07:28, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Aeditor.JPG Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Aeditor.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:42, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Ceditor.JPG Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Ceditor.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:42, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Oeditor.jpg Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Oeditor.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:43, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Imanager.JPG Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Imanager.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:43, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Treditor.JPG Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Treditor.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:45, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Title

The title is in italics but the first reference isn't. Which one should it be so it can be consistent? Coralshin (talk) 00:37, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Developer

The developer is labeled "unknown, not Blizzard Entertainment"

Is there a source for this? That is, who says it was not developed by blizzard entertainment? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.236.116.200 (talk) 17:20, 22 May 2014 (UTC)