Talk:Wardner, Idaho
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Kent Sullivan in topic One possible citation for the History section
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Style
editI've repeatedly reformatted this article for several reasons:
- Section headers aren't supposed to have capital letters, except for the first word and proper nouns—thus "Further reading", not "Further Reading"
- Infoboxes have picture sections for a reason—thus moving the more useful picture there
- Sandwiching text between two pictures or a picture and an infobox is deprecated—thus removing the other picture from its previous place
- Large amounts of white space are poor-looking—thus removing the other picture altogether, rather than moving it to the other side
- The use of good hatnote templates, instead of approximations, is good: that's why we have them!—thus using {{otheruses4}} in place of {{dablink}}
Nyttend (talk) 23:33, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- Placing a 1904 photo in an info box with current data such as 2000 census data & a zip code seems inappropriate. Perhaps the 1910 census should be substituted. http://files.usgwarchives.net/id/shoshone/census/1900/wardner-a-f.txt
- Deleting a second photo because a white spot remained after the improper relocation of the first photo borders on vandalism.Tinosa (talk) 16:01, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- This is hardly vandalism: it's following proper style. Be careful about using loaded terms. Nyttend (talk) 18:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
One possible citation for the History section
editNot sure if anyone is looking after this page but in case Yes: https://www.fairhavenhistory.com/content/our_neighbors/wardners_castle has good info on James F. Wardner. Kent Sullivan (talk) 00:34, 15 November 2022 (UTC)