Copyvio?

edit

Chetsford, despite the fact that LargeGeek (talk · contribs) has created their account just to talk to me, I am inclined to agree with their querying of the speedy tag. The copyvio bits are a relatively small part of the total. I have zapped the Setting section because that may well be a copyvio from the official website. As to the bit that matches this at crayons.com.au I think it is more likely that the copying is from Wikipedia. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:14, 24 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

That's fine, I'll defer to your judgment, RHaworth. Chetsford (talk) 21:45, 24 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:37, 21 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:07, 27 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Blanking of Faction and Setting Sections

edit

The sections concerning factions and settings have been utterly blanked by Soetermans under the justification that it was part of a game guide. While the section of game play falls under this rule, the two other sections did not. They have not been replaced either and have generally lowered the quality of the article through the removal. Can someone attempt to revert the edits with the previous sources or otherwise attempt the replace the missing setting and faction information, as the faction and setting information is crucial to understanding the game. — Dragonair23 2:55, 29 August 2024 (UTC)