Original vs. rehabbed

edit

For the Rohrs, and the 2000 and 3000 Bredas, we need to separate out the facts/figures for these cars as originally delivered, vs. how they exist rehabilitated. I'll play with it some more when I get home, but I just thought I'd throw that one out there. I plan on doing some more reworking on the article when I get home as well. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Rearrangement

edit

I rearranged the article a little bit - what do you think? SchuminWeb (Talk) 09:16, 9 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Stopping sounds

edit

I think it would be great to add some detail on what makes the particular braking sounds. It seems to be a hot topic on YouTube to speculate what makes the noise: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=is5vzJPBksQ ("electrical reversal in which the motors are braking speed to stop the train"), http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6dc5JdMgd0 ("the sounds come from devices called GTO thyristors, which feed pulses (the gear changing sounds) of current to the traction motors") Bajenkins (talk) 04:00, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well, the 3000 and 4000-Series Bredas get their distinctive buzz from an electronic "chopper", but as for the others, I couldn't tell you right offhand. Either way, though, I would think that descriptions of these sounds would be better placed in a different article than this one, perhaps one on AC motors? SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:37, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Some people think the motors are essentially being put into reverse to stop the train, some think they are being used in regenerative braking, and some think it's just normal motor noise. I don't see the harm in adding two or three sentences to the effect of 1) the buzzing is made by chopper-controlled DC motors in the unrehabbed 3k/4k series, and the whirring/whistling is caused by xxx in the AC motors. and 2) it's motor-reversal/regenerative/whatever braking. Moreover, I think it would be better to put the information in this article than as an aside in a AC/DC motor article. Bajenkins (talk) 22:02, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
YouTube speculation is not a reliable source for inclusion in Wikipedia articles. If the mechanics behind Metrorail breaking sounds are documented by reliable sources, I'd favor their use in cited references with a related article. —Adavidb 01:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm certainly not suggesting YouTube speculation is a reliable source of information. It's just that I noticed the widely varying theories and came to Wikipedia looking for the correct answer. I was kind of amazed that it was not mentioned anywhere. Bajenkins (talk) 17:28, 14 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Alstom for 7000-Series?

edit

This question is mainly directed at Fan Railer, but if anyone knows: Where does it show that Alstom won the bid for the 7000's? From what I can tell, bids have been requested, but no winning bid has been named. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:54, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

my bad, i was suppose to delete the alsom thing, since i copied the datatable from the 6000 series section, but got caught up in putting new info on it that i forgot to delete it. according to the attatched document, we won't know the selected builder until the third quarter of this year, with the prototype cars arriving the second quarter of 2012.Fan Railer (talk) 03:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Okay, sounds good. I figured it was probably a goof, but wanted to ask just to make sure. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Article for possible future use

edit

http://www.progressiverailroading.com/passenger_rail/news/WMATA-to-put-first-of-new-cars-in-service--10634 SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:04, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

New Images for the 7000 Series

edit

Updated images from the public unveiling now available. We should update: http://www.flickr.com/photos/metroforward/sets/72157629547185295/ http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Lx3TjngvNMs/ThXtTpJFNaI/AAAAAAAABzc/mnT0rJx260U/s1600/newmetro.jpg http://www.wmata.com/about_metro/news/PressReleaseDetail.cfm?ReleaseID=4971 Fan Railer (talk) 14:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Floor height

edit

Washington Metro rolling stock. CAF specs show a floor heght of 1,000 mm (39.37 in) and Ansaldobreda specs a floor height of 40 in (1,016 mm), so 38+12 inches (978 mm) is phantasy. Peter Horn User talk 02:24, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

rehabilitation?

edit

Rehabilitation is a very odd word to use here. Wouldn't refurbishment be more appropriate? 82.46.109.233 (talk) 08:56, 16 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

6000 series section out of date

edit

There's a great deal of text talking about tests from some years back as if they are still ongoing. Mangoe (talk) 20:57, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Split 7000 series into separate article

edit

The section for the 7000 series trains needs to go into a separate article. J4lambert (talk) 19:16, 12 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Washington Metro rolling stock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:23, 15 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Special Trains - Pickle and Money Train

edit

I saw in the article that the 8000 series was going to be the replacement for some of the older stock. Cited in a PDF from 2008. I also found that the "money train" cars were renumber to the first four spots in the 8000 series. I'd like to update that section and also include a section about the TGV or Pickle. Do you think it should be in this article or in the main DC Metro article? Chuckbenson (talk) 17:43, 16 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Summary

edit

The summary table does not match the cited numbers of trains in service, and seems to represent original research. Are there any references for these numbers Zr2d2 (talk) 13:56, 25 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Washington Metro rolling stock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Citation for number of 7000-series cars in service?

edit

Does anyone have a citation for the number of 7000-series cars that are currently in service?Daybeers (talk) 00:17, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Number of cars in lead

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians! I'm not sure what the 1,138 number is in the lead: I tried to do some calculations and I think it used to be the total number not including newly-wrecked cars and the 7000-series. Should it be updated to reflect the cars which are currently in active service, or the number of cars ordered so far? Daybeers (talk) 18:42, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

According to page 148, there are 1238 currently owned cars, and 1132 in service, as of November.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 19:00, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I realized I never thanked you for this! I know you saw my edit with the updated information because you sent me thanks for it, but I still wanted to thank you for this link! Daybeers (talk) 22:16, 18 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
There is no reason to say sorry. Thanks for your work.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 22:26, 18 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

2016-2017

edit

Breda 2016-2017 are currently being converted to serve as a money train pair for the system. If anyone can find an article, or picture about it and add it to the 2000 series section, it’ll be good to go. Transitfilms6420 (talk) 18:03, 15 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

5000 Series as Deicer Train

edit

Earlier I heard that there were 5000 Series running as an "Deicer Train" today (1/29/19) and I'm unsure if anybody will have a source or picture evidence so we can add it to the section. We have it on facebook though as somebody said.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:37, 13 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Aging the only replacement reason?

edit

Does anyone think aging is the only reason why the 7000 series replaced the 1000-series, the 2000 series, the 4000-series and the 5000-series?