Talk:Washington Old Hall

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Dormskirk in topic County

Disputed

edit

George Washington's ancestral home was Sulgrave Manor, in Sulgrave, Northamptonshire. He had no connection with the town of Washington. Grutness...wha? 12:44, 26 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Looks like both where home of George Washington (or at least his family).

http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/main/w-vh/w-visits/w-findaplace/w-washingtonoldhall/

"George Washington's ancestral home was Sulgrave Manor, in Sulgrave, Northamptonshire. He had no connection with the town of Washington. Grutness...wha? 12:44, 26 December 2005 (UTC)"

Incorrect. As shown by link above.

Also to say that he had no connection with Washington, Tyne & Wear, is just pure stupidity considering it's historic fact.

Yeah, I've already mentioned that on Grutness' talk page, he was just mistaken that's all. hedpeguyuk 1 July 11:00 (UTC)


Why would this article have a little comment noting Washington Town in England as 'the original'. Unlike a lot of American cities which were indeed named for English towns, Washington, D.C. was named for a person not a town. --71.163.118.20 (talk) 07:31, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

National Trust pilot

edit

Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 09:02, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

County

edit

An IP has suggested that Tyne and Wear no longer exists as a geographic entity. The UK Government thinks otherwise. See here and here and here. Dormskirk (talk) 16:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply