Talk:Washington State Route 168/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –CG^Talk 20:22, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "Forrest Roads" in RD.

   Fixed. --Admrboltz (talk) 00:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   No reference for the final sentence of RD.

   Doesn't really need one, look at any map to see any detour. --Admrboltz (talk) 00:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   An image of the area would be nice, but not necessary for GAs.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Just fix the two comments and its all good. Merry Christmas! –CG^Talk 20:22, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Looks all good. Pass. Merry Christmas! –CG^Talk 06:52, 26 December 2010 (UTC)